NOTE: At some point, before bed, I read through 50+ news sources and share my findings here. If you like it, share it. If you don’t, share it. Follow my blog now to support my work or to find new reasons to complain about it. My opinions are my own. All tips are welcome. And if you have not already, help spread the message that people should be judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.
The Sick and Twisted Experiments of Dr. Anthony Fauci
Dr. Anthony Fauci performed a number of sick and twisted experiments on dogs. The experiments were unnecessary, without human benefit and all at taxpayers expense. Check out this quote from The Daily Caller.
Documents from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) obtained by a taxpayer watchdog organization reveal that the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, spent $1.68 million on unnecessary research that killed dozens of beagle puppies.
Between October 2018 and February 2019, NIAID-funded research at SRI International involved force-feeding or injecting 44 beagle puppies aged 6-8 months old with an experimental drug before killing and dissecting them, according to documents obtained by White Coat Waste Project (WCW), a taxpayer watchdog organization with a focus on scientific research. The research, deemed unnecessary by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), cost taxpayers $1.68 million.
The NIH documents stated the experiments were conducted “to provide data of suitable quality and integrity to support application to the U.S . Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory agencies.” However, following reporting by the Daily Caller and others on previous WCW investigations, the FDA stated this summer it “does not mandate that human drugs be studied in dogs.”
The SRI research involved cutting the dogs’ vocal cords so they could not bark, as well as experimentation on mice.
A bipartisan group of legislators demanded answers from Fauci on his cruel experiments. To quote The Hill…
According to the White Coat Waste Project, the Food and Drug Administration does not require drugs to be tested on dogs, so the group is asking why the need for such testing.
White Coat Waste claims that 44 beagle puppies were used in a Tunisia, North Africa, laboratory, and some of the dogs had their vocal cords removed, allegedly so scientists could work without incessant barking.
Leading the effort is Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), writing a letter to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) saying the cordectomies are “cruel” and a “reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds.”
“Our investigators show that Fauci’s NIH division shipped part of a $375,800 grant to a lab in Tunisia to drug beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sand flies so that the insects could eat them alive,” White Coat Waste told Changing America. “They also locked beagles alone in cages in the desert overnight for nine consecutive nights to use them as bait to attract infectious sand flies.”
According to The Blaze, “…lawmakers want Fauci to reveal how many drug tests have been performed on dogs since January 2018, as well as what are the total costs and what is the justification for them.”
I agree with the outrage and think it justified. However, I am also asking the same questions that the website RT has made on the topic. To quote…
One must ask why the popular outrage against Fauci over animal cruelty is not matched by an equal (if not more forceful) outrage over the doctor’s crimes against humanity. From his enthusiastic support of gain-of-function studies to his efforts to sideline a cheap, effective drug that could have saved thousands of lives during the AIDS epidemic in favor of a highly toxic alternative, Fauci’s hands are covered in the blood of humans as well as that of canines.
Indeed, Fauci’s behavior during the Covid-19 outbreak – trashing cheap but effective treatments in favor of expensive alternatives lacking proof of efficacy – eerily mirrors his actions during the early years of AIDS. Thousands of people have died in both cases after Fauci pushed deadly or ineffective medications – most notably the failed cancer drug AZT in the 1980s and the failed Ebola drug remdesivir in the last two years – while safer and more efficacious remedies sat on the shelf.
You might be too young or ignorant of the controversies surrounding the AIDS epidemic of the 1980’s. Back then, Dr. Robert Willner, an American medical scientist noted for his role in AIDS research, once accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of genocide. Two quotes from “The Herald.”
Willner, who championed the view that AIDS is not caused by HIV infection, condemned members of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for allegedly perpetrating the “most horrible scandal and scam” ever perpetrated in the name of science and in all history by claiming that it is.
He said that the horror of the attack on Pearl Harbour during the Second World War in 1941 did not match the atrocities allegedly being perpetrated by Fauci and his colleagues at the institute, whom he described as “scoundrels of the worst order, criminals guilty of genocide”.
I think Fauci’s experiments on dogs were reprehensible.
I think Fauci’s handling of the AIDS epidemic was worse because it caused the death of human beings. If safer drugs were available, why experiment with less effective pharmaceuticals?
Experimenting on human beings without informed consent is wrong. And in light of that, allow me to share two things. First, a quote from Christianity Daily.
U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci reportedly admitted in an interview with Meet The Press that the COVID-19 vaccines are not actually safe for people.
The said interview was cited by Washington Gazette from a Jan. 29, 2021 New York Post report. The Gazette said Fauci “blatantly stated that the country needed to ‘make sure’ the vaccine truly is safe before” it is given to children by conducting “hundreds to a couple of thousands” of tests on children.
“The reason is traditionally when you have a situation like a new vaccine, you want to make sure, because children as well as pregnant women, are vulnerable, so, before you put it into the children, you’re going to want to make sure you have a degree of efficacy and safety that is established in an adult population, particularly an adult, normal population,” Fauci remarked in the said interview.
The Gazette pointed out that this indicates uncertainty in the vaccines’ safety yet would still use it to undertake the test on children who would come from the “general public.”
“So we don’t know if this vaccine is safe, but we’re going to pump it into children anyways. But what is particularly striking about his statements are when he said we needed to be certain of the vaccine’s safety in a “normal” population. For those of you who are scientifically-minded or work in the field of vaccine testing or statistics, you likely know this means a population that represents the general public,” the Gazette said.
The Gazette raised that Fauci’s recent statements indicate “there’s no way anyone could have said this vaccine was safe because the trials didn’t consist of a normal population.” It cited Pfizer’s test being performed on “healthy individuals” while Moderna is mum on the type of individuals their clinical trial sample had.
With that quote in mind, please consider the headline below very carefully.
If children were to die from this vaccine, it would be tragic and horrible. Likely though, the media would suppress the story and the larger population might not learn of it until much damage was done.
However, if animals were to die from this vaccine in horrific ways, there would likely be outrage and further action to #ArrestFauci by a bipartisan group of lawmakers.
What does that say about us?